More people are spending their free time watching movies? Why? Good or bad.

It is often observed by the advancement in technology, people nowadays are getting several means of recreational activities, watching cinema is not an exception. There are many factors that are encouraging the population around the globe to invest more time in watching movies. In this essay, the actual reasons and effects of it on the audience will be discussed.

To embark with, cinema has come from miles, from black and white screen to advance 4D theaters, movies have evolved in respect to provide the best entertainment to people. Also, watching a movie is also affordable and widely available in every part of the country, so that any citizen can watch them. Along with that, movies always bring a society together without any discrimination of any cast and breed, every member of the country in spite of their status can enjoy them. In a recent piece of an article published by "The Times", around seventy-seven percent of people believe that watching movies at multiplexes or theaters are the best way to spend lisure time with kith and kins. Certainly, films are best stressbusters from our daily fast-paced critical life.

On the other hand, a certain set of people state that movies are waste of time and money and corrupt our minds, excessive involvement in this activity can impact our physiologically as well as physically, however, it is inevitable that how movies have influenced us from past in terms of betterment of society. Furthermore, the film industry has provided its contribution to different art forms like music, dance, techniques and acting as well, it is a big source of economic aid for the country. In an empirical survey conducted by London's "Oxford University, it ascertained that around eighty-six percent of the population have facilities of different handy gadgets like smartphones, tablets, and laptops where they can enjoy different joners of cinema with convenience and at any point of time. Consequently, this accessibility increases the interest of the audience.

To conclude, I believe that movies have a vital role in the depicting our social standards and factual truth, by the mean of drama, tragedy, romance, and fiction they not even educate us but also, widen our imagination and creativity. Ergo, movies are good for our society and young generation as well.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, well, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1746031746 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91242808313 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589947089947 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7044374012 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.714285714 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216597136372 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665637986337 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621319708424 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120032231711 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461202818826 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.