The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from the suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, traffic congestion has become a grave problem in metropolitan cities. Therefore, it is suggested that the best method to control it is to persuade people towards living in cities. I think this kind of implementation will have more cons than pros. This essay will discuss the drawbacks of it and provide other viable ways to control this malaise.
To begin with, cities are already overcrowded so it is not practical to migrate rural dwellers to cities. If it is implemented, then it would not only enhance the population but also, gives birth to many threats such as inflation, crime and even contaminate the environment. Overall, it will impair the quality of life and reduces life expectancy. To illustrate this further, it is surveyed by the economists that metropolitan cities which are overpopulated are declining their growth by two times as compared to cities which have less population . Furthermore, it brings inclination in unemployment in the cities, which might directly impacts standard of living and growth of economy.
Moreover, there are plethora of ways through which problem of traffic can be control. Authority should offer jobs and amenities to the natives where they live in like suburbs and countryside. Hence, it would benefit in terms of earning, education, health, etcetera. In addition, Online jobs and e-commerce business can be promoted , so that people don’t feel the need of commuting. This will save their time, money and especially environment. Besides this, cities dwellers should also come forward like they can opt pubic vehicle rather than their own vehicle and do car pooling as well.
In conclusion, although cities provide many facilities and opportunities to people but, this cannot be denied that this migrating can leads to other dangers to large extent . Hence, government and masses should rely on other ways to eradicate it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...red to cities which have less population . Furthermore, it brings inclination in u...
^^
Line 5, column 667, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... directly impacts standard of living and growth of economy. Moreover, there a...
^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...traffic can be control. Authority should offer jobs and amenities to the natives ...
^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in like suburbs and countryside. Hence, it would benefit in terms of earning, ed...
^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... and e-commerce business can be promoted , so that people don’t feel the need of c...
^^
Line 7, column 519, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...uld also come forward like they can opt pubic vehicle rather than their own vehicle a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ehicle rather than their own vehicle and do car pooling as well. In conclusion...
^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n leads to other dangers to large extent . Hence, government and masses should rel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27152317881 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8116431628 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599337748344 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6064750151 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6470588235 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159487028414 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460916607586 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376705419039 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946348068686 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131214841371 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.