As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual welbeing. What factors contribute job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers?
Working enhances one to remain busy as well as escalate earnings to fulfill needs for the bright future. Doing a job has become a crucial part of life for the excess number of individuals nowadays. Although working for a particular satisfaction paves of multifarious factors, this essay reveals the reality of an expectation of workers.
Several points make the person satisfied with his job. Firstly, everyone is in seek of an eco-friendly environment in the working area. Mixing up with colleagues speaks up the volume of equality and becoming friends of each other to alleviate homesickness issues. Moreover, salary could be referred to as a decisive part of satisfaction. Earning scant money results in weak savings and vast family crises. For instance, one member cannot run the family in good condition by having fewer earnings, even cannot fulfill children's expectations. Thus, the factors mentioned should be observed.
Furthermore emphasizing expectations related to job satisfaction are realistic. Working under anybody is not as easy as making a cup of tea. One has to remain under pressure and certain circumstances to run his family. One member working in a family has several responsibilities like buying groceries, games for kids, car loans, for example. Since one person working for just satisfaction, expectations cannot be fulfilled.
In conclusion, the factors making a person satisfied are dependent on his expectations. Satisfaction makes a person happier regardless of working for just expectations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reality of an expectation of workers. Several points make the person satisfied...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...factors mentioned should be observed. Furthermore emphasizing expectations rel...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ors mentioned should be observed. Furthermore emphasizing expectations related to job...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, expectations cannot be fulfilled. In conclusion, the factors making a pers...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51271186441 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15291539164 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8217233654 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.5294117647 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8823529412 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228464186044 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739615192674 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753952706269 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148209854047 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633647309894 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.