News stories always attract people on TV or newspapers. There are different ways which publishers prefer to have their stories on media. Beside writing, depicting pictures for describing an event has been always a popular method for arousing people's interest. Some people think it is much more effective than relying just on the phrases. To cast more clarification on the offered point, the following seems necessary.
Nowadays, people's lives are completely occupied with daily activities and they are more than willing to have everything as clear and concise as possible at their disposal. They normally prefer to have access the information in a classified and easy way. Hence, it is a good idea to have a picture in order to summarize the whole concept so as to make it easier for individuals to decide whether to follow the section or not.
To explain the above point in details, it is worth saying that people's visions and feelings are in harmony and when they see a picture they could be able to digest a specific implication. Not only is it a way to whet the appetite, but also it can be used to educate people subconsciously. For example some educational issues could be taught to people just by grabbing their attentions by an inspiring picture.
In conclusion, as people tend to use social medias and they do not have temptation to read newspaper and articles, like in the past, it is better to find a way which is much more convenient to give them the whole idea and persuade them to follow the story. Apparently, it is an innovative way to make people as well as children to be enthusiastic about reading different subjects. Having mentioned the above reasons, I, personally, find it quite effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
...oint, the following seems necessary. nowadays, peoples lives are completely occupied ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...in order to summarize the whole concept so as to make it easier for individuals to decid...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. Having mentioned the above reasons, I , personally, find it quite effective.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77348217767 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3075613933 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187092547959 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680871790634 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626795983701 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112627964926 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643773195471 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.