it is thought by some that when stories show up with images attached to them they seem far more attractive and understandable whether on tv or in the newspaper. I support this viewpoint based on potent facts and valid instances which all will be discussed further in this essay.
To embark upon, it is an irrefutable fact that when a reading section comes with an image to follow it prevents the mind from getting fatigued of reading it and you can keep on reading as far as you can find some visual sections besides the text of a story. To encapsulate this view let me present a survey which is conducted by Canadian scientists two years ago. These experts divided a group of elementary school students into two part of 10 students. The first group has been presented a story without any attractive images Conversely the second group has been given the same story this time with two colourful images along with the text. The result is predictable the first group after only 30 seconds put aside the story whilst the story have been finished and understood by the second group.
Having all said, I think there is a strong relation between our understanding perception and the imaginary part in the brain. The more we can see things the more we can imagine and accept them. Stories with fiction or non-fiction theme or the cliffhangers such as comic books and thriller can be stuck in the mind when they have been offered by related impressive visual documents. It is also noticeable to mention that actually, 80 per cent of understanding occurs when we are using our eyes to learn something new or read something such as novels, papers or articles. Consequently, images in news or storybooks help us to remember them more effectively.
By way of conclusion, I completely confirm the assertion presented by several people based on presented facts such as the vision ability in humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is thought by some that when stories sh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, conversely, first, if, second, so, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79510703364 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66643870192 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9500277276 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.615384615 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104693379633 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385253904226 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028093148254 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637720787465 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321577791919 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.