On media as TV or newspapers, whether the news in combination of pictures and texts are more effective than in the words only is still in question as my concern, in that both of them are essential to the news reports.
To begin with, the news stories can not exist without text content since it is the main structure of news. Read by reporters, the words are the first information gained by audiences. With this introduction, we can get to know the time, place and events happened clearly. After the words, the pictures from live report could assist us to understand the news. At this time, with the comments of the reporters, we can know more details and the stand of the media.
However, if there are few picutures in the news, audiences may get boring with the stories reported on media, even confused with the things happened in the news. Without live report in pictures, we may not know clearly how the twin tower crashed by the planes hijacked by the terrorists in 911. Let alone the photos of the victims jumping from this building. These pictures genuinely represented what was happening on that day, as the day we will remember forever.
In all, neither of the two contents could be negelected in the news report. More pictures are not necessarily express less ideas than the words, it depends on the stories presented by the media. The war news for instance, pictures of the victims and injured soldiers are more impressive than the words to show the eagerness of peace. Thus based on the way of reporting, the media should be more flexible with using prictures or texts, which are the tools to show the points they want to share with us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun ideas is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...re pictures are not necessarily express less ideas than the words, it depends on the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65870307167 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42792887292 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535836177474 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3136336641 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251773417293 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871191988472 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689096284242 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166737603982 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486823466091 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.