News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this?

Essay topics:

News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?

In recent times, it has been noticed that a vast majority of newspapers and television channels are publishing news stories with relevant images. Many people believe that it is a more effective way to present news stories among people. I strongly believe in this fact that inserting pictures in the text containing news stories is a more constructive way to present ideas. In this essay, I will discuss my opinion further with relevant supporting reasons and examples.

To begin with, people learn more effectively by a visual representation of factual information rather than reading it. Humans are less enthusiastic and energetic to read texts, they feel more comfortable in seeing information visually instead. So, newspapers should insert some kind of images related to the subject of news stories. Inserting images could help people to understand the topic. One thing you should know about the visual representation is that the human mind is more effective when they watch a picture or image instead of reading the entire text. Therefore, televisions and newspapers should publish news stories with some visual images rather than large text or speech.

Furthermore, the news stories, containing pictures or images, would be helpful for people in order to save their important time. Because reading text takes a long time, people feel bored while reading. Also, when they read the full text then they have to be alert and attentive to avoid any confusion. In many newspapers, for instance, some articles could be longer and take a longer time to read it. In this case, it should be better to conclude the large information into a single picture or image. Thus, it could be helpful for people to save their crucial time.

Lastly, a large number of people, who are illiterate and unable to read, found it very useful while looking at pictures showing news stories. However, they still have to struggle with the understanding of keywords related to the mentioned images. Moreover, it is really important for children, who are unable to read complex texts, to understand the meaning of the large news stories. For example, nowadays, most of the newspapers publish their headlines using some factual pictures, which are easy to understand for children.

To sum up, I would like to say that publishing and broadcasting news stories visually is more effective than other modes of news. It has a plethora of benefits of visualizing the factual information, such as huge time savings, easy to understand the topic, and illiterate people are able to understand without reading the whole text.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... to save their crucial time. Lastly, a large number of people, who are illiterate and unable t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, lastly, look, moreover, really, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13443396226 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69407663315 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48820754717 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4564290478 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9545454545 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23193963576 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747261121045 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597783331718 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137442355726 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598441325225 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.