now a day many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. in what ways has technology affected personal relationship? has this become a positive or negative?
According to recent technological development among societies, many new revelations are put forward on people’s aspect of life. However it is anticipated a few of them would have a terrible effect on their personal relationship but it seems to me that the beneficial of it have more advocated than dangerous risks. I wish I could capable enough to explain the way of advanced influence on human interactions.
It is clear that technology has brought many innovations in way of people‘s interaction. The profound exhibition of this is while we return to entrance of communication device to our private life. By applying them we could keep in touch with our close friends who are not as accessible as it expected to be. Indeed it is possible to build up relationship more strongly than before. Also it not only should be easy to find out lost friends within social media such as Facebook, Skype and Instagram but, it might be more convenient to get to know new members and create relation immediately.
While return to completely surveying, it is considerable people‘s life style now a day have converted to less difficulties compared to many years ago. In fact stay in touch with people transfer to not expensive and wasting time issue, it is promoted by advanced gadget devices. However most of the people are engaged to their communication appliance like mobile phone, tablet and mac book pro that are caused them to become cyber addiction ,but there is not more imperative pressing problem as long as we concern about computerized advantages.
In balance calculation, although every new approaches related to technology have their own risk of danger ,but in my opinion advanced forms of communication device have had largely effect on human interactions, and social network predictably could capable us to prevent and sustain relationship in strongly manner rather than before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...orward on people's aspect of life. However it is anticipated a few of them would h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...not as accessible as it expected to be. Indeed it is possible to build up relationship...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...relationship more strongly than before. Also it not only should be easy to find out ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun difficulties is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... life style now a day have converted to less difficulties compared to many years ago...
^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...is promoted by advanced gadget devices. However most of the people are engaged to their...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re caused them to become cyber addiction ,but there is not more imperative pressin...
^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...technology have their own risk of danger ,but in my opinion advanced forms of comm...
^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sustain relationship in strongly manner rather than before.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16828478964 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05787056057 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2109533246 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.083333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154268433941 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590511420245 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451130326447 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893145674109 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326865833923 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.