Nowadays, all new town planning should include public parks, shopping malls and sport facilities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Designing the layout of a new town is an extremely intricate process. The question what should and should not be included sets the foundation of the town’s identity forever. In my opinion, the addition of public parks, shopping malls and sport facilities is essential to the incubation of community and the encouragement of healthy of lifestyles. I thus agree that these items should be included when a new town is being planned, and I will share examples to prove this.
Firstly, public areas and shopping centres help new towns foster a sense of community. For examples, my small Canadian town has a very nice park near its centre. At weekends, the open context of the park environment makes its possible for people to meet each other and create friendships. This sort of organic community building is seen in my home town’s shopping mall too. Shopping malls encourage interaction and thus they are great forums within which people can mingle and have experiences that could evolve into friendships. Thus, the helpful role public parks and shopping malls play in the establishing a new town is clear.
Secondly, sports facilities catalyse positive lifestyle choices among town folk. For instance, the central location of my small town’s football pitch is a regular reminder to people passing by that exercise is important. Children in the town are visually aware that sport is accessible to them, and thus they engage in physical activity regularly. This is a clear advantage to town designs that include sport facilities.
As the above shows, public parks, shopping malls and sport facilities are helpful in many ways to the establishment of a town. Their inclusion in the planning of a new town is thus highly recommended.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, sort of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10839160839 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78680102695 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3123752493 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352752917753 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123224328204 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735283217492 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23058187654 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545442296542 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.