Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Experiments involve a large amount of testing. In the present era, human beings are heavily using animals as their samples for validation of results in the field of medicine and for the assurance of safe usage of various other products. Some people opine that this method of animal experiments should not be used anymore, whereas others hold the notion that there are various advantages of animal experiments to the human being. I am in a favour of wildlife testing. In this essay, I will discuss both the viewpoints.
There are several advantages of animal testing. First and foremost, a wide range of samples is available in the form of different species. For example, as the people living on different parts of the globe have different body structure and their health conditions are dependent on the temperature and geographical conditions of a certain region, animals of these areas can be used as testing sample, this increases the chances of the safety validations of a product for a huge population. Furthermore, this concept of animal testing is not modern, even this method was used by our ancestors for their researches. For instance, in the eighteenth century, Indians used to test the medicines on rats to find out any side-effects of the medicine.
On the flip side, there are various characteristics of animals which differ from homo sapiens. Therefore, some people believe that animals should be spared from the suffering of different tests; however, in my opinion, the testing on wildlife species give a high level of results which make a vital contribution in the analysis. Moreover, people in other professions are killing and hurting animals as well. For instance, in food industries, people are killing animals for food and, in other industries hunting wild species for leather, which comparatively raises more death rates of animals.
To recapitulate, I believe that the positive outcomes of animal experiments far outweigh the negative consequences. Although animal experiments involve killing and suffering of animals, proportionately it can save a large ratio of human population as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24705882353 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92131529366 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.3149075515 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343867378916 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110040233239 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771543733897 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211010307743 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645655875043 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.