Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples.
People keep pets in their homes for various purposes such as poultry farming and for emotional support. In continuation to the aforesaid notion, some persons opine that having animals at a home is beneficial for kids whereas other analysts believe that it is very unhygienic and insecure for the children to have animals as a part of their family. I am a strong advocate of the former view that kids get benefitted in various ways to have pets as their companions. In this essay, I will discuss both the viewpoints.
Pets are good for children in many ways, First and foremost, animals help to develop caring and sharing nature in kids. Because animals require to feed them, this would eventually increase the quality to serve in offspring. Moreover, animals as buddies would develop the trait to share things. All these qualities would gradually make kids empathetical and that would be advantageous to him and to the society in a long run. Furthermore, playing with animals would increase the mental level of kids. For instance, studies have found that kids interacting with pets on a daily basis are more likely to grow faster in comparison to offspring playing with toys. Last but not the least, having animals at home would keep children safe from external threats like thieves.
On the contrary, some critiques think that having animals at a home is not hygienic for kids like their hair and excretion can create health issues. Besides this, having animals at home could be risky for kids too. For instance, recently in London, a dog bites on a kid arm in a fight between the two for a ball. Although, animals are dangerous for kids sometimes, yet these risks can be overcome with proper training and supervision.
To recapitulate, the advantages of pets for kids far outweigh its negative consequences. In my opinion, animals are kids best friend and offspring learns many things from them; however, its parent’s responsibility to make sure that pets would not harm their kids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'feeding', 'feeing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: feeding; feeing
...nature in kids. Because animals require to feed them, this would eventually increase th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'kids the best'.
Suggestion: kids the best
...onsequences. In my opinion, animals are kids best friend and offspring learns many things...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95535714286 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63475908348 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.767805732 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17135279881 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606587510499 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417121105785 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106602162621 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329580052757 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.