These days’ superstars attained popularity and fame due to sum of capital and luxury assets they possess, and not because of their accomplishments hence, established contradictory effects on off-springs. To some extent I agree with the above mention statement. This essay considers how megastar life style influenced teenagers in both ways.
Firstly, to begin with, modus vivendi of celebrities has influenced youth of this century and had impart pessimistic effects on their personalities. In addition, research have found that eighty per cent of young children intimate what they perceive. Kids invest enormous amount of their time watching television and internet surfing regarding their favorite film starts. Consider what they like to eat, wear and what sort of car they secure number of lavish mansions they poss, what is there future destination for holidays. For instance, I have witnessed number of children nowadays are more brand conscious and follow fashion style of their ideals. One diversely followed superstar in makeup industry is Huda beauty adolescent girls and womens’ are under huge impact of her beauty lines.
On contrary, there are some VIPs’s famous for both their luxury life style and gigantic accomplishments that support various social and moral reforming sectors of this society. One magnificent personality is the Oprah winery her work and efforts considered as substantial contributions made in controlling violence against women victims of rape and child abuse. Nevertheless, another significant name of Bollywood film industry is Amir Khan who is popular for making such movies constituted of reality messages which promoted awareness in this society.
To conclude, it is about human perception we ought to be carefully think before choosing our role models. However, if a balanced approached is adapted in educating our offspring’s and iterate them to this story all that glitter is not gold rather than criticizing superstars for their fame and luxury life style impacting contradictory effects on teenagers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, sort of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61146496815 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96320081146 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671974522293 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1761146386 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269033131928 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083595445531 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594205014438 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144189572616 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405022048219 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.