Nowadays congestion and traffic jams are a common and major problem in most cities. Some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What can be the solution, in your opinion?
It is recommended various control measures such as appropriate land use planning and creating buffer zones for sensitive receptors. Installation of noise barriers for hospitals, schools, colleges and old-age homes, establishment of no- honking zones especially for residential areas and silence zones and development of poro- elastic road surface for traffic noise control are some of the other measures recommended in the study.
The fact is undeniable that nowadays congestion and traffic jams are increasing day by day. To curb with this problem, many people suggested the idea to construct wider roads. However, I am not disagreeing with the suggestion and according to me; there are other ways which can be suggested as below.
First of all, widening the road, as suggested by some people, to reduce the problem of too much traffic and movements has some limitations. Firstly, to increase the size of road, government has to cut down the trees adjacent to it. There are a large number of which are planted alongside the road. Therefore, to increase the lane, the department has to destroy the plants, which give the birth to another problem such as increase the air pollution and global warming. Secondly, if road’s sizes are increased, there will be left limited space for another infrastructure development. There will be few spaces available for national parks, construction of new colonies, museums, new railways lines and parking areas etc. therefore, instead of this solution to meet this problem, there are other alternatives.
It is commonly known to us that the most common reason for congestion is people have a lot of disposable income and due to that many people are able to buy cars. Therefore, the people should be stimulated to use the public transport the most. Resultantly, there will be less cars or motorcycles on roads, which automatically reduce the problem of which the people are facing out. Also, the government should also take stern action or imply new law which insists the commuter to use railway transport or public buses to control the traffic jams. For example, the Singapore government is making the plan to stop the registration of new vehicle. This transformational move will not allow any growth in its car population from February 2018. In addition to this, car pooling is also a proposal to limit the vehicles on road and reduction in traffic jam.
At last but not least, by citing the above mentioned suggestion it can be concluded that only widen the road is not feasible idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d surface for traffic noise control are some of the other measures recommended in the study...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ea to construct wider roads. However, I am not disagreeing with the suggestion and according to me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...own the trees adjacent to it. There are a large number of which are planted alongside the road. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 271, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rt the most. Resultantly, there will be less cars or motorcycles on roads, which aut...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10336538462 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81276605415 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550480769231 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9645535056 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.15 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254804733673 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779707889361 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063430569692 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140027891588 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767990812677 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.