Due to technological advancements in all the fields of living of the people, cooking food and preparing other eatables have become better and easier. An influx of electric appliances for the activities like managing fire, kneading floor, peeling and chopping of vegetables and so on are available in the market. In the upcoming paragraphs both the benefits and shortcomings will be discussed apropos to the food in recent years.
First and foremost improvement in the lives of the masses is the lucrative lifestyle that is being inculcated while getting each and every work by using machines which include any kind of physical activity. For instance, food processor, mixer, grinder, gas stoves, microwave oven, etc are so popular in almost every kitchen that women can concentrate on other chores and can work part-time to support their families. Moreover, gas stoves and microwave do not cause pollution which prevent the cooks from any kind of ailments especially respiratory diseases. Indeed it saves lot of time used to be wasted on preparing basic bread and butter. Lastly, the appliances providing easy methods for cooking have an another industry, in turn, leads to an additional factor for rise of economy of the country.
Nevertheless, there are multifarious drawbacks of automating all the phenomenons required for food as such food destroys most nutrients in the fruits and vegetables that make it less healthier and tastier. Furthermore, microwave rays imparted on the food items while cooking are the source of various ailments in the folks. Also, less physical activities in doing daily household chores are making the echelons suffering from obesity and cholesterol.
Overall, humans are living in such an era where every work would eventually be done by artificially intelligent robots that a man would not be required to work anymore. So its a better idea to focus on the quality of what is to be eaten so that people can live sound in winds and limbs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...lments especially respiratory diseases. Indeed it saves lot of time used to be wasted ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 705, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an industry' or 'another industry'.
Suggestion: an industry; another industry
...providing easy methods for cooking have an another industry, in turn, leads to an additional factor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less healthy'?
Suggestion: less healthy
... the fruits and vegetables that make it less healthier and tastier. Furthermore, microwave ray...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...uld not be required to work anymore. So its a better idea to focus on the quality o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16459627329 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77365358315 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0129221255 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.923076923 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114105803331 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391129444383 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373915757354 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668359062177 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181618697606 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.