These days, global tourism has become the largest industry worldwide. While it is argued that it promotes more tension than understanding between different cultures, I disagree with this notion as international tourism has the potential to foster cross-cultural understanding outweighs the drawbacks.
One of the primary reasons why international tourism can create tension is because several foreign travelers may engage in impolite behaviors. More specifically, some visitors often participate in behaviors that are not acceptable in the countries they visit, which can leave a bad impression to locals of those nations. For example, women in some countries of the Middle East have been required to wear headscarves in public. If tourists disregard this custom and fail to cover their heads, it may be perceived as disrespectful and considered to be a taboo against locals. As a result, this can result in tension between foreign visitors and local residents.
However, cross-country tourism can foster mutual understanding between nations as it provides tourists the opportunity to immerse themselves in foreign cultures and learn new traditions. Therefore, by traveling to different parts of the world, tourists can gain a deeper appreciation for cultural diversities and develop greater understanding and empathy for people from different backgrounds. For instance, tourists visiting a traditional Japanese tea ceremony may gain an insight into the importance of respect and ritual in Japanese culture, which can help foster greater mutual respect and understanding between people from different cultures.
In conclusion, although international tourism can create tension between countries due to impolite behaviors from tourists, I believe that it will bring mutual understanding. I am also convinced that every tourist should look for customs and habits of the countries they visit before traveling formally in order not to cause any tension.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73883161512 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10866483779 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4339545607 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281587521679 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104855379637 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939801515213 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189481317745 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955012414094 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.