Nowadays, Internet and television have given ordinary people a chance to become famous. Is this a positive or negative development?

Essay topics: Nowadays, Internet and television have given ordinary people a chance to become famous. Is this a positive or negative development?

Saira Faiz's picture

Social media has immense influence on the general public and can make or break anyone’s reputation in a nick of time. I believe there is no doubt that in correct circumstances, this is a valuable tool. However, if used wrongly, it can become dangerous weapon and detrimental to both individual and society.
Technology has changed our life and the way we communicate and socialize. Social media is the focal of our life and can take any form from sites like Facebook, twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, online blogs to newspapers, magazines and Television. These media can prove to be the greatest benefit for the ordinary people in a number of ways. Firstly, Teenagers and professionals who have deep knowledge of a particular subject- Mathematics, English literature, Software, Science, Makeup, Lifestyle, Cooking- can make videos and post them on YouTube. These in turn help them to earn money and additionally serves an enormous number of people to gain insight about a subject. Secondly, Reporters go to remote areas and reveal the talents of individuals, who otherwise could not afford to go to major cities to sell their products and services. Thirdly, these cites publish details of day to day life of successful entrepreneurs, businessperson so that others could follow their footsteps to spend an accomplished life.
On the other hand, if these media promote bad hobbies and characteristics- pornography, terrorism, violence and scandals- of individuals, it can have lethal effects on youngsters and teenagers as they have not developed their own beliefs and opinions so they can easily be affected and follow their footsteps. Secondly, various programs produce wrong information and facts and figures to get high rating of their program. This could lead individuals to form a wrong concept and context of the event. Thirdly, television produce programs about individual life to get cheap publicity like reality TV programs. Finally, there are so many low-grade videos posted by people on YouTube that they simply waste a lot time of anyone to get to the proper information about the subject matter in question to learn new skills or solve any problem.
In conclusion, I believe these media is playing an incredible role to give a platform to people with talents and skills. However, they should scrutinize their content before publishing, posting or streaming.

Votes: 
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
3 weeks 5 days ago Suman1234 84 Read full essay
1 month 1 week ago Sneha k 73 Read full essay
1 month 1 week ago Ell 73 Read full essay
2 months 16 hours ago kushal kushal 78 Read full essay
2 months 1 day ago kushal kushal 78 Read full essay
2 months 1 day ago kushal kushal 73 Read full essay
2 months 1 day ago kushal kushal 73 Read full essay
2 months 3 days ago kushal kushal 78 Read full essay
2 months 3 days ago kushal kushal 67 Read full essay
2 months 3 days ago kushal kushal 11 Read full essay
More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...cial media has immense influence on the general public and can make or break anyone's rep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raphy, terrorism, violence and scandals- of individuals, it can have lethal effec...
^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efore publishing, posting or streaming.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94470156604 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.805140826 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.352941176 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087567562095 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268214883538 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259282285586 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494481355457 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175246191504 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages