Nowadays managers and team leaders in different organizations are much younger compared to the past. What are the reasons for it? Is it a positive or negative development?
In last one decade, there have been tremendous changes in companies. One of the prominent changes is that emerging leaders and managers are quite young in comparison to the past where such responsibilities were adorned mostly after the age of forty five. There are different reasons of this eminent change.
The principle reason of this change is the incorporation of technology. In the present time, manual way has been replaced by the sophisticated technology and particularly young people who are apt in those areas are exalted to higher positions. For instance, my nephew who is automobile engineer enriched his knowledge in use of smart and digital devices in his sector, has been promoted to head of technology in sound department.
Another reason is availability of information on internet and mobile. In the old times, there were limited sources of gaining the experiences and advanced information. Moreover, people never openly shared their millions worth tricks and facts. However, with the inception of computer and internet, young people not only search the information but also interact with people in the industry over internet and learn primary skills required to fulfill those premier jobs.
Furthermore, the education pattern has also been amended to embellish student’s practical exposure and specialized courses have been commenced to captivate further experience. For instance my son has finished risk management course in finance which increased his agility to take decision in risks scenario than old colleagues.
To recapitulate, automation, internet and advanced university courses ae the major drivers for growth of youth in establishments. I ponder that this trend is positive as young people use the technology effectively and also bring new ideas in organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een tremendous changes in companies. One of the prominent changes is that emergin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50902527076 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02280557479 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624548736462 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9203872692 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958612350956 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348219463325 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388424983119 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518997249097 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345294348644 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.