Nowadays, it is common in many organizations that young people are playing a leading role in their management or decision making bodies, as compared to the last century. In this essay, I will discuss the primary reasons for this trend with relevant examples, and why I feel that it is a positive development.
There could be many reasons behind this development, while the two significant factors are related to the cultural and economic conditions of a family. Mostly in Asian regions, parents start schooling of their children early, due to which they complete their tertiary education at a young age. Consequently, they start their career early and are more likely to be a part of higher management during their thirties. As per reports published by Human Resource and Development Ministry, the average age of people to be a leader in an organization in India is 28 years because the average age of children joining the school is 3 years old. Another important reason is associated with the financial condition of a family. People from impoverished backgrounds are more likely to start their job at a young age to support their families.
In my perspective, this trend is positive because it could reduce the crime rate in the society. In many parts of the world, young people are mostly involved in criminal activities due to their immaturity. Starting a career early would make them more responsible and mature enough to understand the consequences of involvement in the crime. Thus, they will utilize their energies in positive directions to enhance their job profile and life. Sunday Times has published the data about the crimes in Japan, and as per the statistics, it was clear that the crime rate in Japan has significantly reduced in the last 5 years because young people are staring their jobs at a young age.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that the young generation is taking higher positions in corporate sectors as they start their jobs early. Primarily the financial and cultural backgrounds are the reasons for this development, and undeniably it is beneficial for society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, thus, while, i feel, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02005730659 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81775694289 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501432664756 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7513273242 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104145821222 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404282902705 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384400514999 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846835875741 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466753392974 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.