Nowadays, the world is facing the scarcity of food items, and the demand for food has drastically increased. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons for this menace, and also suggest some viable solutions to curb this problem.
The primary factors responsible for this negative development are rapidly growing population and usage of the traditional methods in the agriculture sector. Without question, the shortage of food is due to the rapid expansion of the population. It has increased the consumption rate but the annual yield is still the same. Additionally, using the old ways of cultivation has further worsened this situation. In many countries, the annual rate of crop production has decreased because the traditional methods have reduced the fertility of the land. As per the survey conducted by The Sunday Times, more than 30 percent of the agricultural land has lost its fertility in recent years due to the usage of old methods in the agriculture sector, thereby reducing the production.
Admittedly, the above-referenced issues exist; however, these issues could be resolved by adopting measures, namely educational programs and improving farming techniques. The educational campaigns could be helpful in controlling the population growth as they can educate people about the consequences of the exponential growth of the population and its effects on food resources. For example, Japan was successful in controlling its annual population growth in recent years after these awareness programs. Moreover, there is also a dire need to find advanced techniques to increase the annual production rate without compromising the quality of the soil.
For example, yield can be improved by using suitable fertilizers and a better irrigation system.
In conclusion, the demand for food is increasing due to the uncontrolled expansion of the population and using primitive methods in agriculture. The awareness programs and technological advancements are the feasible solutions to resolve these issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, still, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53721682848 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08940656499 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537216828479 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4726840321 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.066666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166381704641 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595759867489 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612435374371 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106254321404 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605174994518 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.