Playing sports is the key to good health. A section of society advocate that games played in teams, such as football, have more benefits whereas others have strong counter-argument that individual sports, namely tennis or swimming, are one step ahead in advantages. In my perspective, both types of sports are essential for character building in human life. This essay will delve into both aspects with relevant examples in support of my argument.
To begin with, sports played in teams develop many traits in players such as empathy, compassion, and teamwork. As these characters are imperative for building an ideal society in which people are considerate for others. Moreover, this will help in building a strong and peaceful social structure. For Instance, a survey carried out by New York Times reveals that people playing games in teams are more co-operative in nature. Hence, importance of sports played in groups cannot be ignored.
On the other hand, individual sports promotes self-confidence and decision-making abilities in players. These attributs makes a person not only self-dependent but also psychologically strong to take effective and efficient decisions in life. For example, research by Cambridge University shows that players playing individual games have better decision-making capability as compared to others. Therefore, individual sports have vital role in an individual's life.
In conclusion, both types of sports develop different types of qualities in people which have paramount significance in building a society. So, in my opinion both types of sports serves different purpose and both are pivotal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...individual sports have vital role in an individuals life. In conclusion, both types of s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04923859349 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9136600889 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240355697306 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080318152642 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379387611377 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142101782136 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166218733326 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.