It is often argued that the effective solution to prevent road accidents is brought down the speed limit. However, I firmly disagree with this notion because the key reasons for the road incidents are careless driving and poor road infrastructure. In this essay, I will espouse this view with relevant examples in support of my arguments.
Although many people follow the traffic guidelines, yet the main reason behind the increasing rate of road accidents is careless driving. Nowadays, It is common that people are using mobile phones or playing loud music while driving. Consequently, it causes a distraction for the driver, and the biggest reason for numerous fatal accidents in our daily life. A study carried out by the Cambridge university reveals that sixty percent of the total accident reported in last year were due to the usage of mobile phones while driving by the driver.
Not only careless driving but also the poor road infrastructure is another reason behind the accidents. In this modern era, roads, even in the developed cities, have conditions such as potholes and non-functional traffic signals due to which accidents took place during the rainy or winter seasons. For Instance, as per the reports published by the Indian Government, thirty percent of the total accidents happen due to the substandard road conditions. Therefore, improving the quality of the roadway can help reduce the instances of road accidents.
In conclusion, the primary reason for accidents is negligence driving and substandard road network conditions. So, I believe that reducing the speed limit is not the ideal way to avoid accidents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26996197719 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77435252038 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58174904943 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4397252393 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.615384615 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0299812257166 0.244688304435 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0123248787565 0.084324248473 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0187294964262 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0169984596948 0.151304729494 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112822277359 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.