Since the last century, transnational visits have become economical due to the advancements in transportation networks. However, it has sparked a controversy that the tourists from other countries could cause enmity with the local inhabitants rather than promoting mutual understanding, due to the different cultural backgrounds. I completely disagree with this notion, and I believe that this trend will increase harmony among locals and tourists even though they have different cultural values.
The primary reason why there will not be any hostility lies in the fact that native people have financial benefits linked with tourism. Travelers generate a huge scale of employment for the locals, and any incident of enmity with international visitors can have a detrimental effect on their source of income. According to a recent survey, approximately a million people traveled to Dubai in the last 5 years, yet no incident of resentment involving any tourists has recorded.
Furthermore, the upsurge of international tourism will reduce the communication gap. It is a widely accepted fact that understanding among people who belong to various cultures will improve with the increase of interaction because it will not only alleviate the conflicts but also promote a better understanding of traditions and cultural values. For instance, many Asian countries have had discrepancies on various issues with western countries. However, they were able to resolve their issues with interaction, and now they share a common understanding of many international matters.
In conclusion, international travel will not create any tension among people from different traditional backgrounds, instead, it will improve the co-operation and understanding of cultural values. Therefore, the notion that international tourism will cause tension must be discouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... issues with western countries. However, they were able to resolve their issues w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76363636364 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21264855591 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7977334359 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223413292727 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086732985893 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527480739936 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142365349244 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047758691246 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.