Nowadays many people choose ready made food and refuse to cook at home.
Why do you think it happens?
fast food influnced people in order to forgot about traditional foods
people who work full-time cannot cook everday
A considerable number of people assert that the preparation of convenience food is too time-consuming and needs more human efforts in contrast to fast foods. Consequently, they prefer quick meals despite home cooking. As far as I am considered, the underlying advantages and disadvantages inherent to the brought forth prompt must be scrutinized before coming up with a firm conclusion.
Certain reasons for this phenomenon is, first, fast foods influence people to forget about traditional foods through deceptive advertisements, which allure them to buy it. Secondly, people who work full-time cannot cook every day. Maintaining the work-life balance and family life become hard to them if anything that alleviates their burden they ready to opt for it.
On the other hand, the major advantage is, it is affordable than so-called health food. The cost of buying fast food is less than the making and the provision cost of a healthy meal. Moreover, it is bad only if the intake is too much. For example, having processed food from your favourite restaurant is highly acceptable, until eating double the portion.
Yet, as part of demerits, eating a lot of fast food can cause health problems such as obesity. As per the recent survey, 30% of people turned to become overweight and about 10% fallen death comparing to last year. Furthermore, it contains saturated fats and sugars. To keep the quality and taste of the food, preservatives are added. Hence, eating such man-made chemicals will jeopardise our health to perilous.
All in all, though fast food is cheap and easy to get, it engenders severe health problems which leads to untimely demise as well. I take this view on account in a fit of the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12195121951 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84085183026 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658536585366 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2881291668 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4705882353 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25505135666 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068495151753 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772492125557 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12025086971 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728500794931 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.