Nowadays, many people drive to work or school instead of walking, cycling or using public transport. Does this trend have more advantages or more disadvantages?
Evidence suggests that driving personal cars to the workplace or school has replaced walking and the use of bicycles or public transportation. Although there are a number of benefits accruing from using personal cars, I believe that the drawbacks involved are more.
On the plus side, there exist some advantages for commuting in cities by own cars. To begin with, these vehicles are much more comfortable than are other forms of transport. Simply put, many opt for them due to the fact that they lay the groundwork for the convenience that many individuals can capitalize on. Stopping anywhere one desires, traveling long distances with having full control on air conditioning and heater, and being able to go shopping after work or school are salient illustrations. Furthermore, they can be less time-consuming. In terms of being in a rush, walking, cycling or public transport would not be the best alternatives.
However, not using more eco-friendly means of transport has serious consequences. The most axiomatic argument is concerned with air pollution. In fact, the more cars are on the streets, the more we are prone to breathe polluted air. As a result, it will pose many health implications to the city dwellers, who easily disregard their responsibility of protecting the environment. Moreover, owning a car is more costly. Take annual insurance fees, the price of gas, and the possible fees of repairing them as examples, they could entail a huge proportion of one’s monthly budget.
In conclusion, regardless of benefits, I think driving personal cars for daily matters can be problematic both financially and environmentally. Thus, it is highly advised to go for other types of transport instead of personal automobiles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, so, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24372759857 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07556957699 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6156145575 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257232011708 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743036800407 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563720184416 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140160306199 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485969742968 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.