Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some individuals believe that severe penalties are of paramount importance in order to dwindle car crashes, others, however, are of the opinion that some other steps would have more effectiveness in boosting the safety of streets. I, for one, think the first view is correct on the basis of some compelling reasons.
On the one hand, the advocates of the notion that other measures, apart from tough punishments, could have more efficacy assert that the benefits accruing from it are by no means negligible. Firstly, the would-be offence might be happening for the first time. Here, punishing these lawbreakers in the most strict ways would not be fair. Instead, it would be more logical to fine them a suitable amount of charge, and warn them for the possible offences in the future that the punishment is going to be tougher than the first time. Secondly, many drivers contend that the conditions of the roads are so appalling, such as eroded asphalt and lack of signage in many areas. Therefore, it is these poor conditions of the highways or streets that cause accidents, not drivers.
On the other hand, many put forward the argument that driving offenders will not cease their dangerous actions unless they face severe punishments. First and foremost, driving so dangerously with high speeds, many of these so-called drivers are not truly aware of the possible consequences of their fatal mistakes. In fact, Many deaths and physical disabilities are annually attributed by these lawmakers. Second, the more strict driving rules are come into force, the fewer people are bound to encounter any danger while driving. In other words, having tough driving rules in conjunction with severe punishments for the ones who break them can result in fewer car crashes, and in turn, decreased death rates of road accidents.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that there is no room for complacency when it comes to the lives of the public. Offenders should face the consequences of their reckless driving as tough as possible to make it a good lesson for others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun put seems to be countable; consider using: 'many puts'.
Suggestion: many puts
...ents, not drivers. On the other hand, many put forward the argument that driving offen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02040816327 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60017777176 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559766763848 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0576078594 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271606945936 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827683622745 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596006339205 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157547713271 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650356382631 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.