It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While some people argue that some children come to this world with particular qualities in different fields like sport and music. Others, however, are of the opinion that any types of skills can be developed by children through teaching and all of them have the potential to turn out sports figures or musicians. I agree with the latter, because hard work is said to be as the centeral aspect of career and personal success.
On the one hand, supporters of this notion assert that being a prodigy is hidden in the person’s genetic and the benefits accruing from it is by no means negligible. To begin with, since only a few numbers of the public can get to the point of greatness in their fields, irrespective of how much effort they put into, they should have the superior genes. That is to say, it is their genetic which plays the significant role of flourishing. A good illustraition of this is the Olampic gold winners in specific sports fileds who come from particular regions with unique genes. Moreover, many children demostrate themselves as being talented in various areas such as music in early ages. This, in turn, has a far-reaching positive impact on their performance, affecting manifold aspects of their life.
On the other hand, others put forward to the arqument that all the skills can be honed by all children. The most compelling reason justifying their assertation is that the more they practice and train, the better they become in their field of studies or sports. In other words, the majority of the greatest champions or artists of all times, were not near as skillfull and qualified as they ended up when they started their journey. Take those full-fledged athletes who began their path towards success; some of them even were told to be totally incapable of fostering their performances in training sessions back at school. Furthermore, many of these all-around musicions have revealed that they have allocated as much time and energy as they possibely could in order to enhance their efficiency.
In conclusion, I am convinced that persistency and determination will outweigh genius, regardless of your innate abilities. Altough there might be some exceptions, overall, hard work and dedication will always beat talent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01333333333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69467425366 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602666666667 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3255894887 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154585421442 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519464896429 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461544081792 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996005235628 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593379087666 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.