Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
Foreign movies and domestic films have been fighting in an unfair battle in many countries during the past decades. It is true that many opt for foreign films instead of local ones to watch. There are a number of compelling reasons behind this phenomenon. Local film industry, however, ought to be financially endorsed by governments in order to compete with its overseas counterparts.
To begin with, there exist some convincing facts why foreign movies are preferred more. First and foremost, having the leading roles in the most robust movies, these full-fledged actors and actresses are unbelievably popular, and in turn, pique many people’s interests around the world. Second, the high quality of foreign versions, from acting to sound effects, are by no means negligible. Take Hollywood movies and series as examples, they are produced with the most advanced means of equipment and technology. Therefore, people would crave watching the mentioned pieces of work due to their fantastic scenes and acting.
This can be turned around, however, with financial incentives for local filmmakers provided by government. Firstly, in order to compete with the international film industry, indigenous film producers require the same equipment. Cutting-edge computers for post-production, up-to-date lighting kit, and suitable sound recorders are salient illustrations in this respect. More number of competent and skilled artists and directors are also needed. For this reason, a huge amount of funding and attention is required to train all-around actors and actresses who people love watching.
In conclusion, owing to the fact that foreign films attract much more attention than do domestic versions, governments should allocate budgets so that local film producers could access more modern equipment and educate better artists.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59712230216 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81836311417 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640287769784 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0173703087 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411517503127 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116192201275 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102470259689 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247704946005 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102613754872 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.