It is generally believed that some people are born with certains talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is clear that most people have their own talent not only in sport but also on art . While some people agree that these ability can inherit from their parent, I side with those who believe that this ability can be taught to be good at this skill by some particular person.
There are many reason why this talent of individuals come from nature. First, it is argued that people can be received any ability by genetics, that’s mean these individuals would get a huge benefit if they was had a gene which is suitable for any field. For instance, Micheal Phelps has a positive aspect in his arm, so he can get a huge number of gold medals in Olympics. Moreover, when some individuals in the parent has master in a particular ability, their offspring can be easy to learn this trait because they can observe it everyday. Take Son Heungmin as a particular example. The famous of this footballer is came from his father, who is also a well-known Korean Footballer.
However, it is clear that anyone can achieve success with the right coaching. They say that many children receive a nurture from their parent, which make them not only have an awareness what is right or worng but also learning some practical skills. For example, time arangement is one of the skill that children can learn from their parents. In addition, independent is the result that someone who was learnt on any skill. When someone teach them about the skill in any field , not only did we shape our personality, but we also put our mind to do sth to be successful. For instance, before Becoming a Well-known fighter, Conor Mcgregor had worked as a plumber and he had tried hard on any workout so that he could pay for his living.
To conclude, It is a great debate on compare about what do talents come from nature or nurture, and some people suppose that it may be come from any feature of nature. Therefore, I believe that some individuals will reach to the bright career if they have an appropriate nurture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...talent not only in sport but also on art . While some people agree that these abil...
^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this ability' or 'these abilities'?
Suggestion: this ability; these abilities
...o on art . While some people agree that these ability can inherit from their parent, I side w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... this trait because they can observe it everyday. Take Son Heungmin as a particular exam...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...ample. The famous of this footballer is came from his father, who is also a well-kno...
^^^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'teaches'.
Suggestion: teaches
...o was learnt on any skill. When someone teach them about the skill in any field , not...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... teach them about the skill in any field , not only did we shape our personality, ...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er if they have an appropriate nurture.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60281690141 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42809160449 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532394366197 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2644572899 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237952610823 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724089145825 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544128704275 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15628013298 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534078466759 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.