Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion/

Choosing a buddy or a companion may seems like a difficult decision to make. Some individuals tend to make friends with people who held common interest, similar ideas and taste. However, not always a person can choose who they want to be with, most likely they can meet someone with contrasting beliefs. I believe, it is essential to have friends that sometimes disagree with my views instead of sticking to a companion who always agree and support my own opinions.
Firstly, friends with different viewpoints can be a chore but it can also be a risk worth taking. Staying to someone who can see things differently may help broaden your limited perspective to an issue. For example, when someone is surrounded by a group of friends with variety of personalities, there is a tendency to expand someone’s horizons by way of absorbing different opinions. Another example is that, an open minded people who can adjust to contrasting behaviours pose to develop a personality change. By having a unique sets of companions, someone will experience personality change as human’s personalities are fluid and malleable.
On the other hand, having a friend with similar viewpoints for many things is truly beneficial throughout life. Being surrounded with like minded people who can help you strengthen and back up your opinion can led to a deeper connection. One great example is when you encountered a heated argument with peers, your friend will take sides on you because you shared the same belief and opinion. To get involve in a heated arguments can be traumatic but if someone is unconditionally standing behind giving you support then you will feel secure. Moreover, disagreements on issues due to different ideas can cause discomfort. Therefore, maintaining friendships with people with the same opinion can have a huge impact on your psychological well-being.
In conclusion, friends can play contrasting roles whether to support your opinion or disagree with your views. The charm of friendship is that it works both ways. Nevertheless, developing relationships with friends who possess dissimilar outlooks will presents an opportunity for you to explore the different side of life.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decision to make. Some individuals tend to make friends with people who held com...
^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'argument'?
Suggestion: argument
...and opinion. To get involve in a heated arguments can be traumatic but if someone is unco...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'present'
Suggestion: present
...ds who possess dissimilar outlooks will presents an opportunity for you to explore the d...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21529745042 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97851611279 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560906515581 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6788053788 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.277777778 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314794874054 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103955692992 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742120043035 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207414774964 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579630331086 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.