Nowadays more and more business meetings and business trainings are taking place online.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Online communication is not a new phenomenon and during the last decades, however, it changed the way that we do our daily tasks dramatically. Although it makes the reading of the body language of participants harder during a meeting or a training session, It has significantly made the training more accessible to the people and also arranging the meetings easier.
Previously, people had to meet each other face to face to hold any meeting or training. It is more efficient to follow a person when is present physically there as you can read also his body language readily. However, having these types of meetings or educational sessions cost the participants an arm and a leg. In addition, due to the short or long travels, the meetings and training sessions will be tiresome and attendees contribute inevitably to air pollution and global warming which are not desirable.
On the other hand, holding them over the net makes which accessible to those who live or work far away or in the remote areas without any extra cost. As an example, consider Grundfos an international Danish company wants to hold a training session for its employer in three different countries, without the online communication it would cost a fortune for the company but if they hold it over the internet, they will reduce the cost dramatically. The other positive point is arranging a meeting over the net is much easier since people need to just find free time just for meeting and there is no need to consider the traveling time which can be in some cases days.
In summary, Doing business meetings and training sessions over the net has pluses such as ease of access and arrangement which with no doubt overweighs its minuses such as being harder to read the body language of participants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'face to'.
Suggestion: face to
...eviously, people had to meet each other face to face to hold any meeting or training. It is mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in addition, in summary, no doubt, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91749174917 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76175908188 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53795379538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8592873011 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140678610572 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577002110464 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464920940286 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992217852027 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417271190372 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.