It is argued that young people who are seeking for job seeking jobs see older ones as their rival in employment process. So it would somehow result in obstacles in the way of youth. In order to solving these issues, there are some appropriate means to be considered.
On the one hand, young people often find it hard to compete with older people regarding being successful in getting a job. Those who take advantage of more experiences and adeptness are people who spend several years in workplaces. So suppose a newcomer who has not possess adequate experience and have just finished his/her academic courses ought to be compared with older ones with a sophisticated CV. For example, management positions require at least three years managerial work experience that is an impossible thing for a young with management degree.
On the other hand, these problems could be deal with by passing laws that bring up some constraint for older employment. If government define a regulation that force companies or factories to employ youth more for their positions in comparison with older people, thus it gives a chance to younger to secure their beloved job more readily. Similarly, prohibiting companies from employing retired workers and employees could not only be effective leverages to youth, but having drop in retirement age could make places for future generations employees. For instances, in USA some companies like Google and Facebook are not allowed to re-employ their former IT or computer engineers.
To put it into a nutshell, it would be definitely wise if heads of the nation devise feasible policies that would contribute to abundance of job for young to be taken. Nevertheless, it would demand some laws that should be arranged and determined accurately that limited older people in competition with younger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'possessed'.
Suggestion: possessed
...aces. So suppose a newcomer who has not possess adequate experience and have just finis...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, thus, at least, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15100671141 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76226682504 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5315297553 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.076923077 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262405633373 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939095628609 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686129003074 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151168325473 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540129290949 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.