Understanding of the moral issue by children is an inevitable matter that should be seriously take account. It is argued that children should be thoroughly familiar with the value of wrong and right and punishment is an instrumental mean in order to accomplish that. To me this idea seems appealing since it would affect both individual and societies in coming future.
On the one hand, it is widely perceived that the foundation of human beings form while there are little. So it would be reasonable if they know the distinction between immoral and moral attitudes. Nevertheless, the important thing is the policies that parents and teachers take on. Of course, everybody is unanimous that punishment is a must regarding bringing up of children. Some parent force children to do what they want to implementing severe corporal punishment regardless of thinking about its hazardous results. Punishment could turn out to be either an interesting or dreading thing to pupils. As far as parent foster fair model of punishment, it would appropriately flourish children recognition of wright and wrong. For example, setting a prize for children when they express good behaviors, so they would be more stimulated to do wright things. On the flip side, prohibiting them from playing video games is a sufficient punishment when they commit wrongdoing.
On the other hand, in case of society, false practices of punishment would lead to a boom in violence and delinquencies. This could be handled if parents be cautious in their behavior toward children. Those tender-hearts are susceptible to be a man or women of tact and good breeding. On the contrary, they could be aggressive delinquents. So that parents should not utilize physical or bad way of punishing that would make a scratch on the spirit of children for good. For instance, as it is often argued, children are likely to be parrot and imitate whatever older ones do. If fathers have bad attitude toward them, they will exactly duplicate these nasty habit in the future. Finally, it would be wise if parents at home and teachers at schools use some practical ways of punishment that would not only show them the wright way of treatment, but also encourage them to compensate their bad attitude.
To sum up, it is unquestionably true that children should be able to appreciate wright and wrong in the community. Furthermore, rough physical treatment is unreasonable and they ought to be replaced with new policies that are not detrimental to formation of their characteristic in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, for example, for instance, of course, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07380952381 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93912056663 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9566141228 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8636363636 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230162233677 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686208574626 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494429079463 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144892779264 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538909970422 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.