The table below illustrates the number of the individuals who had a visit from Ashdown museum over the year before and after reparation. Besides, the pie charts give information regarding whether they were satisfied or not and how.
As it is manifest in the table, individuals were more enthusiastic about going to museum after refurbishment by 92000 visitors, while before renovations the number of them was 74000.
According to the tables, it is depicted that the number of visitors who were satisfied before refurbishment approximately doubled after improvement from 15 to 35 percent. Similarly, satisfied individuals of the museum faced a 10 percent growth and by 30 percent the year prior to renovations reached to 40 percent the year after that.
On the other hand, dissatisfied people who had a visit from museum after changes dropped to more than half in comparison with the period before improvement by 40-15 percent. In addition, the survey shows the percentage of very dissatisfied people with respect to the before refurbishment encountered fall from 10 percent to 5 percent after alterations, although the visitors who didn’t respond to the survey remain stables by 5 percent in both period.
To sum up, it is noticeably transparent that the popularity of the museum had a dramatic rise after development. Not only did not the number of visitors to museum an increase, but also the satisfaction of the people with the museum underwent a boom after boost to museum.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, regarding, similarly, so, thus, while, in addition, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17768595041 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00687064704 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50826446281 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3167743181 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.222222222 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4444444444 5.23603664747 257% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31799783581 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138883598452 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535747430244 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182381554709 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649211379866 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.