There are enormous number of museum throughout the world ask visitors entry fee while others are free. People argued the issue and some believe charging people for admission would contribute to privileges to museum. Of course, without possession of economic resources maintenance of museum and especially historical places is not possible.
Nowadays, nations are challenging with loss of their historical remnant and precious master pieces because of lack of means and instruments that would help them keep museum pieces from harm. As a result, having an earn would be a feasible way for provision of museum security devices and infrastructures. For example, there are large numbers of museum-parks in Tehran that are home for hundreds of ancient statute, although they are disappearing every year. Since, there is not adequate security guard and sophisticated devices that could guarantee the safety of them.
On the other hand, the history and originality of nations are keeping in museum and illustration of tribes and all the ethnic group's tradition and custom is expressed by museum. Hence, people themselves should perceive the fact that by paying admission fee they indirectly help themselves authenticity to be stay for good. As a matter of the fact, some people have denounced museum with the torrent of angry worlds for entrance fee prices regardless appreciation of about its upsides toward museum. Indeed, it would be wise if people do either some voluntary work or send donation to museum instead of resenting charging for entry fees.
I think museum should be backed strongly by people since next generation would have more transparent conscious regarding their former ancestor an culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... course, without possession of economic resources maintenance of museum and especially hi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly historical places is not possible. Nowadays, nations are challenging with l...
^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...m pieces from harm. As a result, having an earn would be a feasible way for provision o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...lustration of tribes and all the ethnic groups tradition and custom is expressed by mu...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...nscious regarding their former ancestor an culture.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, regarding, so, then, while, for example, i think, of course, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38289962825 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75981685019 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617100371747 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2816931365 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301359040206 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113191346545 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699925740711 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181293236378 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787695628517 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.