Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development

With the significant growth in the number of social media applications and websites, many people have chosen to socialise in the virtual world rather than interact with people in the real world. In my view, this change in the way that people communicate is a negative development for both individuals and society.

Recently, the number of people who use social media to socialise has increased considerably compared with the last five years, and even though technology has simplified the way we communicate and brought the world closer, it also makes people less sociable. Nowadays, people share their daily lives on Facebook, their thoughts on Twiter, and texting each other on Whatsapp rather than talking and socialise face to face. moreover, the time that people spent online is incomparable with the time they spent with family and friends in the real world.

Human beings by nature are sociable beings, we live in groups and interact with others which allow us to experience, feel, and learn about life, and this can not be through online socialism, furthermore, using social media to communicate all the time is one of the reasons of depression which can be a serious disease that affect people's health.

In conclusion, the development in communication's technology has changed the society in a negative way, and nowadays, people should pay more attention to the face to face communication and to not allow technology to destroy our nature.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...han talking and socialise face to face. moreover, the time that people spent online is i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ions technology has changed the society in a negative way, and nowadays, people should pay more a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14345991561 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.746657198 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561181434599 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4191109973 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.142857143 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8571428571 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32536482871 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152082260889 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948992392937 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194500799465 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836335725851 0.056905535591 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.