There is no denying that online shopping is considered one of the most reliable ways to obtain products in modern society. While shopping via the Internet is efficient in some instances, its contribution to environmental damages and joblessness can be devastating.
The rapid development of online shopping surprisingly has some adverse effects on the current natural situation. This is due to the fact that the use of environmentally harmful packaging material undoubtedly witnesses an incredible rise to meet the demands for delivering. However, its most devastating outcome is usually directed at consumerism. To be more specific, without being able to physically handle products, consumers would find themselves making disappointing purchases. Besides, the various mocked discounts and false advertisements online would expose many buyers to obtain unnecessary products, which can be problematic for personal financial status or the stock market as a whole. With all the factors above combined with the consistent growth of demands, it would not be surprising if both the environment and the economy become unstable.
Unfortunately, the environment is only one of many victims that online shopping takes its toll on as the loss of many individuals’ occupations becomes alarming. Since many products sold online are stapled to sales and discounts, many businesses taking part in product investment would be tremendously backtracked. As a result, many businesses would close down, and inevitably turn their back on their employees. While a portion of the unemployed would eventually participate in the virtual market, the effects of online shopping would be more emphasized for people with difficult financial status. Now that their only source of income is gone, the quality of their lives would be miserable for an extensive amount of time.
In conclusion, while online shopping has the power to resolve geographical issues for many people wanting to obtain certain products, taking many negative factors such as environmental alternation or the rising unemployment rate into account is precisely critical.
- Summarize the changes in the layout of the Woodward University in not less than 150 words 52
- Task 2 Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many countries What should be done to increase cycling 78
- Summarize the changes in the layout of the Woodward University in not less than 150 words 91
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage of the natural environment what are the causes and possible solutions 61
- We were given two diagrams showing Darwin city waterfront in 2009 and after the 2014 reconstruction We had to compare and describe both of them 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63125 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12309316824 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6452088666 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.714285714 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134576870518 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511222265006 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357760118054 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08683559922 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030435831617 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63125 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12309316824 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6452088666 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.714285714 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134576870518 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511222265006 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357760118054 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08683559922 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030435831617 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.