Nowadays, parents are allowing their children to use tablets and smartphones to enhance learning.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In the present days, modern technology has paved the way of living a life. Adults are letting their pupils to use advanced technological devices, such as tablets and cellphones, to improve their learning trajectory. This essay intends to delineate the merits and demerits of the accessibility to such gadgets.
The use of phones and tablets could cause detrimental effects on the health of infants. Allowing the offspring to use such machines would proliferate the dependence on these gadgets, and they would not go outisde the house for any information; thus, this would lead to a sedantary lifestyle, which might affect their health dramatically. Moreover, kids may click on a suspicious link while using the internet that might take them to a dangerous content, which could drastically impact their mental health. To illustrate, a weblink could demonstrate a violent content such as terrorist videos that may hurt their sentiments or foster them to indulge in such actions.
Furthermore, the smartphones and tabs have made the information availability very convenient and time-saving. The little ones do not need to go out and waste time on scrutnizing for the required details. They can obtain the intrinsic data from their devices with the help of the web that would be time-effective and enhance the learning process. For instance, many websites provide online classes to schoolchildren and also help in solving their questions.
To conclude, many advantages and disadvantages are associated with granting the reachability to these products. However, the pros outweigh the cons because a healthy lifestyle and avoiding access to dangerous videos are crucial for the flourishment of children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41729323308 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0200795036 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616541353383 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6120688423 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.846153846 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234880639747 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668546923312 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441520465277 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118804005484 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137398057591 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.