Only 20% of Tech Jobs are Held by Women.
What problems do women face that prevent them from getting these jobs and what must be done to change this situation?
In the present era, the employment rate around the world has dramatically fluctuated that has impacted many potential candidates. The percentage of female employees holding tech designations is only 20%. This essay shall elucidate the fundamental reasons of the occurence and plausible solutions to fix this astonishing circumstance.
Nowadays, the call centers require many engineering candidates due to an organization's technical work. Generally, such firms operate in the night due to their international clients who could not be reached during the day because of time distinctions. Thus, females are not preffered in such positions because of overnight work atmosphere. Besides, the unemployment rate of technological vacancies has dwindled drastically, due to which various individuals do not have jobs. For instance, the need of tech graduates plunged enormously in 2011 that resulted in half of the engineers' population being unemployed.
Many resolutions could assist in plummeting the challenge of less women holding tech opportunities such as flexibility and allowance to work in night shifts and moving to other territories. Companies could grant womans to work in night times with the implementation of intrinsic safety measurements for them. In addition, governments should should render strenuous efforts to plan and strive to proliferate the emplyment ratio so that people are not left without jobs. To illustrate, many ventures provide cab facilities along with guards for the security purpose of women; consequently, they are safe even when they are not in their nation.
In conclusion, providing opportunities to women is significant for their career, and to ameliorate their future. Certain parameters could be analyzed and executed to control and fix the problem that would help females to flourish in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an organization' or simply 'organizations'?
Suggestion: an organization; organizations
...uire many engineering candidates due to an organizations technical work. Generally, such firms o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'engineers'' or 'engineer's'?
Suggestion: engineers'; engineer's
...ly in 2011 that resulted in half of the engineers population being unemployed. Many re...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun women is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d assist in plummeting the challenge of less women holding tech opportunities such a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
...ents for them. In addition, governments should should render strenuous efforts to plan and st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65342960289 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15421424404 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624548736462 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1997601018 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110238429498 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356522014729 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307703632676 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651567329317 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154320780316 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.