Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the last two decades, It is opined that there is no space for inhabitants on the earth, due to which, providing shield is a useless effort. I do not concur with the given statement. This essay shall elucidate factors such as forests and safety measurement for animals, significant in the present scenario.
The development of infrastructure is done for people but zoo and forests are sustained for animals. Since most places have been occupied for the construction of buildings and highways, it is considered that no place is reserved for the wildlife. However, nations have increased the number of zoo, so that they have a specific place where they could take shelter. In addition, a particular number of forests are left untouched for animals to stay and eat for their survival. For example, governments in developing countries inaugurate new wildlife spaces every year as to give equal significance to the animals.
Furthermore, animals protection is vital for the sustainability of such lives as they are essential for the world. Animals living in zoo must be given food for their survival and medical services are intrinsic to ensure they live long. Moreover, the increase of plantation and decrease of deforestation in forests are pivotal; thus, animals could eat from trees and live comfortably. Additionally, endanger animals, such as lions and tiger, are threat to humans; therefore, it is significant to protect habitants by putting fences in wildlife areas. To illustrate, roads in many countries are covered with electric fences on this sides where animals are accessible and could hurt individuals.
In conclusion, it is irrefutable that mankind has encroached in every corner of the world; however, it has also made preparation for continuous and pleasant life of the inhabitants, which do require necessary shield for everyone’s safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-14 | vonhuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mahyarr | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-27 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | RS1 | 56 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Far too little has been done to prevent animals and plants from dying out although people have been aware of this problem for a long time Why do people do so little about it Give your suggestions on how to solve this problem 84
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 73
- Some say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities in their spare time Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ies are covered with electric fences on this sides where animals are accessible and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as for, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28282828283 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99412750401 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4189644033 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105870586972 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041233477903 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354001679705 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605025663337 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274751723869 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.