It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects shouldn’t worry about producing building as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree?
Many countries attract travellers around the world by their tall buildings. However, it is believed that architects should not bother about the looks of a building, it should only serve a reason. This essay agrees with this statement because a building should be built for a specific reason, and should be safe for others to see, rather than looking beautiful.
In the ancient times, many buildings were built that are now visited and explored by travellers globally. Many buildings are even explained in academic lessons that give some information about such monuments. People get to know why a building was built, and about the living in the past. Such structures give people an in-depth knowledge of buildings and they remember the reason for building it. For example, Taj Mahal tells people about the king Shahjan’s love for his wife and also about the incident of that particular time.
Safety is a crucial concern that should never be neglected while preparing a building’s map. A famous place is visited by many tourists every day to know the purpose it serves. Additionally, such a building should remain strong for long years, so that future generation can also learn about it. Consequently, producing a strong building is of utmost importance for public’s security, and knowledge of the upcoming generation. To illustrate, Qutab Minar, the tallest building in India, was built in 1914 and has been visited by at least 10,000 tourists every day.
In conclusion, beauty of a building plays a vital role in attracting people to come and enjoy. However, it is more important for a structure to serve a purpose, for people to know about past happenings and be safe enough for people to explore in-person.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, so, while, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05964912281 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69435304284 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4176708537 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313383506571 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103070512665 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492456213911 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188886566517 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129616215509 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.