Nowadays some people think that public libraries are not necessary while others disagree discuss both views and give your opinion and examples
The majority of people raised the question upon the value of public libraries whereas others are include them; a necessity. In my perspective, public libraries are imperative for people who cannot buy every book and afford authentic digitised material.
To commence with, who could think that public libraries are important part of societies. The prime reason is easy availability of numerous books at one place. This would be beneficial for those who are unable to purchase every single book. At such places, masses get rational environment of study; they can focus on their studies. It is apparent from Chandigarh city, where almost each sector has its own library ;used by local as well as by migrants to achieve success in particular fields. These libraries provide some consistent opportunity to mark standard outcomes of their hard work, consequently.
Moving further, public libraries give an opportunity to access an authentic data without any cost. Any digital print or data which is copyright of someone is not available free to access. Through these libraries one can afford right content to generate appropriate results or they can avoid wrong information.
In contrast, others believe that place used for libraries could be useful in other ways that are more prevailing in societies or metropolitan cities likeas scarcity of land and less green belts. As those places could be evitable for multistory buildings for more accommodation and parks to reduce temperature in that area. Resulting in, solution to two big issues of the world.
To conclude, ocean of knowledge or library publicly help many people to become successful in their life. In my opinion, public libraries should be there to encourage people to get education. However, place to increase greenery in cities, there are options to have more green area on vertical houses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'included'.
Suggestion: included
... of public libraries whereas others are include them; a necessity. In my perspective, p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
... Through these libraries one can afford right content to generate appropriate results...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rast, others believe that place used for libraries could be useful in other ways ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, then, well, whereas, in contrast, in particular, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26599326599 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70654299093 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646464646465 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.920686905 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187660443382 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059025973025 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616022194119 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107283464986 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482803522154 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.