Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
in what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has the become a positive or negative development?
The-state-of-the-art technology has affected different aspects of life at the present time. One of these effects can be easily seen in our daily-basis social relationships, which seem to be more convenient than they used to be.
The changes brought about by the cutting-edge technology are clearly visible in several routes, taken by individuals in their making of relationships. A notable example could be making friends online, in which someone looking for a partner does not have to spend time visiting people in person; instead they can find their mates on sundry applications available. The other instance of this phenomenon is for applying for a job. In this procedure, a job applicant needs not to go from one company to another looking for a vacancy, but they can email whatever required to potential employers, about whom they have acquired a great deal of knowledge on their websites. These modifications are to found in manifold circumstances as well.
Among all the merits stemmed from technology in human interactions, speed and convenience are of higher significance. The quick ways of transferring data have prevented people from squandering their precious time, which might be considered as an apposite revolution in this fast-paced life; simply put, no one has to spend a lot of time, for instance, giving a prepared report to his boss via ordinary post. Furthermore, all people feel more at ease keeping in touch; Take for example a girl who is studying abroad and can talk to her family and even see them every time she wishes through utilizing numerous facilities accessible on the internet. These are some amenities which would not be on hand, were not there such a modern technology.
All in all, the changes and the advantages caused by technology in our relationships in this wired world are not deniable; the ones that have resulted in an easier lifestyle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, well, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09032258065 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02347561371 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3342581716 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105265293201 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383581028262 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275009123458 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615868727687 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177196992668 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.