The world’s air pollution levels are rising year on year. What should humanity do to counter this problem?
Increasing levels of airborne pollutants have proved to be a major obstacle for humanity in the 21st century. To counter this problem, efforts should focus on the two most major causes of airborne pollutants: coal-based energy and the burning of fossil fuels. This essay will examine the plausibility of addressing this problem through alternative municipal energy sources and traffic regulations.
Firstly, cities that power themselves with coal could shift to more environmentally friendly energy sources like nuclear. Similar shifts have successfully occurred in cities like Shanghai. Although this move would involve several years of reconnaissance work to ensure safety, the results are exponentially cleaner than coal-based energy. If all major cities were to shift away from coal in this way, the world’s air would be much cleaner.
A second approach could involve a change to municipal traffic regulations. For example, some metropolitan cities have imposed carpool lanes to help encourage people to commute together to work. This approach has proved its effectiveness in Tehran, Toronto and New York City, and thus would be a plausible approach to pollution issues in other large cities.
As the above examination has made clear, alternative energy sources and evolved traffic regulations would be effective counters to the world’s current airborne pollution problem. I hope these approaches are put into action soon.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.in what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has the become a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people think subjects taught in schoolare a waste of time, while others disagree and believe that this type ofeducation is useful for students. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- government 56
- pictures for the news 89
- English is spreading all around the world as a global language.Is this a positive or negative development? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64516129032 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90851686683 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649769585253 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8383401636 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212871732271 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657342746473 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603367813735 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118158332334 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559115501322 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.