Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.in what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has the become a positive or negative development?

There have been drastic changes in almost every aspect of life since the emergence of technology. It has replaced the previous ways of interaction by its advancements. This essay will describe how technology has affected the people and the relations they possess.

To commence with, technology has helped people to get connected all over the world. Its advancements have made communication amongst people easier in a blink of eye. For instance, in previous times where one has to wait for days or weeks for someone's message to get arrived in the same country, nowadays one can get a message from the other one sitting in other part of the world in seconds with the help of internet and mobile phone. This has improved the interaction between people from different backgrounds, conveying the message of equality and of a single world.

On the other side, it has created some negative impacts as well. The eye-catching attraction of technology has changed the way of interaction on a local level. For example, the facilities and services given by internet have made people, especially children, addict of them. They can surf internet for hours and do not want to leave their gadgets behind, stopping them will make them angry. This habit affects their psychological behavior, making them filled with anger and socially inactive, or introvert. It also affects the communication skills as well. Thus, technology can defect the relationship as well.

In conclusion, every thing has its pros and cons. Technology is no exception. However, it is made by people to benefit them and they should have to use it wisely so that maximum output can be taken from them to make every relationship better.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04270462633 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75060653292 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55871886121 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0633999215 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3529411765 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247189313501 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781463422768 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489353504076 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144474101591 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393960023717 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

It is a nice essay. It should be more than 5.5 for sure. You may look at those warning messages:

No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.