To some construction of beautiful building is merely a waste of money However for others these buildings are a source of aesthetic beauty and are beneficial in mamy other ways Give you own views

There have been sceptical views about the construction of beautiful buildings; some believe this as a wastage of money whereas others think it as beauty with benefits. I personally believe that it has many benefits with some drawbacks.

To commence with, constructing elegant buildings will help to glorify the location around the globe. For instance, the Taj Mahal in India, one of the seven wonders of the world and made by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in the remembrance of his wife Mumtaj Mahal, is made of granite and various precious stones and it is well renowned in the whole world. Due to the rarity and detailing of the monument, tourists all across the world pay visit there, giving revenue and events of employment in the city. Thus, artistic buildings can help to create jobs, worldwide recognition and money for the country.

Additionally, it also helps to impact the psychological behavior of surrounding people in a positive manner. Recent scientific studies have concluded that the people living in bright and well-planned areas were more creative and dedicated towards their work. This is why companies are now making efficient and well architectured offices in order to save place and make effective workplace for their employees. Such offices have started showing their results, helping some companies to gain greater heights. However, this construction process requires natural resources like land, water, sand, limestone, silica etcetera which will extinct in upcoming years, if used on such humongous usage rate. Moreover, the irregular disposal and insufficient recycling of concrete made thing even more worse.

In conclusion, although it has some demerits, beautiful buildings are beneficial in many aspects. In order to make it more beneficial, drawbacks need to be eradicated very soon by efficient methods and processes.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ological behavior of surrounding people in a positive manner. Recent scientific studies have conclud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 733, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te. Moreover, the irregular disposal and insufficient recycling of concrete made ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37800687285 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77754654745 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656357388316 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0964494626 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.785714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181318982187 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587087179357 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781173700106 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115855953233 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610530623177 0.056905535591 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.