When a country develops its technology, traditional skills and ways of life die. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Technology has spread its web all across the world and with its advancements, almost every individual can see and use the development. It is believed that a nation forgets the former skills and living styles when the technology is developed. I agree with the above statement and explain the same in the next paragraphs.
To begin with, technology has helped the world to create new methods, which helps to do the work in an effective manner. For instance, where production of items on a large scale requires a humongous manpower and time, technology in the form of automation process has greatly reduced the need of time and workers. Such advancements are time- effective, money-effective and highly productive in comparison with the conventional skills and working practices. Thus, technology has influenced greatly, making previous practices die out or obsolete.
Additionally, technology has modernised the way people live in comparison to the past times. The main reason behind this is the development of living standards by these increments. For example, transportation facilities nowadays has helped people to reach far and distant destinations easier, within days or hours, whereas ancient modes of transportation took weeks or even months to reach far places. Same changes can be seen in the case of communication where a person can contact someone in other part of world within seconds. This shows that the previous ways are updated when one uses technology.
In conclusion, with a modern world, almost every thing depends on the technology, making the existing skills and living styles fade out.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective manner" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...new methods, which helps to do the work in an effective manner. For instance, where production of item...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30859375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98136454428 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.394456487 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.538461538 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20306509047 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717543298603 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056253387609 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115039832206 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405558887238 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.