Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In this day and age, the proportion of waste in society is climbing every year. This phenomenon happens due to the popularity of plastic material and the low quality of recycling facilities. However, the government should bring up some rules to solve this problem.
To begin with, there are many reasons why waste is created every year. Firstly, it is clear that these popular items of every household are made of plastic, which will transform into waste if they cannot decompose after being thrown away. For example, soil pollution often happens when the amount of plastic waste doesn't decompose. Moreover, the quality of each recycling facility is too low because of lacking source investment, which means that it never recycles enough waste due to the demand of people. Take Ninh Binh as a particular example. There is a huge waste which cannot be broken down when there is not an appropriate recycling facility.
Nevertheless, there are many solutions which every government should do to solve this phenomenon. The primary one is using first-used materials, which can be easy to break down after being used. For example, there are many stores in Da Nang that use a first-used cup to encourage most people to save our environment. Additionally, the government should bring up the policy to attract as many investors as possible to invest in recycling facilities, so these firms are never worried about recycling the rubbish because of having enough money.
Finally, the popularity of plastic materials and the low quality of recycling facilities lead to the rise in the production of rubbish. Even when the government takes part in bringing up many first-used materials and giving the support policy for recycling facilities will this situation be solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...appens when the amount of plastic waste doesnt decompose. Moreover, the quality of eac...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rubbish because of having enough money. Finally, the popularity of plastic mater...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67659465564 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538194444444 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.877808064 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0952256934807 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03696493681 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347058365867 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659897405277 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247753801472 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.