The important of rubbish pollution has now becomes even more controversial. This also fluently generates a great deal of heated debates so it is compulsory to find the original cause and effective solutions.
At the outset, there are a myriad of reasons why people is producing more rubbish but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that global population is increasing significantly. In fact, there are now about 7 billion peoples living in the earth, as the result, people consume more and more rubbish is discharged into the environment. Another point can be taken into consideration comes from the fact that the efficiency of the production is still low. For example, some process needs a vast amount of resources to put into the production; however number of products is limited.
Hence, approaches to deal with the setbacks originated by rubbish pollution are innumerable. Firstly, to control population grow up is the most effective solution which is not impractical and unattainable but comprehensible and feasible. Actually, the most increasing comes from the third world countries. So, this is not only the task of these nations but it needs also a global action. This means governments of different countries have to help each other. Furthermore, the new technologies need to be introduced into the production. For this purpose, governments are responsible to help companies to upgrade their technology chains. Actually, while investing in science to study on new technology is a useful action to process, governments can also buy from the developed countries to reduce time and cost.
In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, I believe that although the rubbish pollution is now a crucial issue, the causes are clearly seen and various solutions which need the collaboration of governments from different countries could be adopted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... solutions. At the outset, there are a myriad of reasons why people is producing more...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, third, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0831729688 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2303726666 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204665365709 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646930265377 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570056968552 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113715206996 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440736238937 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.