The important of rubbish pollution has now becomes even more controversial. This also fluently generates a great deal of heated debates so it is compulsory to find the original cause and effective solutions.
At the outset, there are a myriad of reasons why people is producing more rubbish but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that global population is increasing significantly. In fact, there are now about 7 billion peoples living in the earth, as the result, people consume more and more rubbish is discharged into the environment. An instance illustrates this action is the fact that every people discharge 1.5 kg of rubbish every day in average following a recently research. Another point to be taken into consideration is that the efficiency of the production is not very high. For example, some process needs a vast amount of resources to put into the production; however the number of products created is not really much.
Hence, approaches to deal with the setbacks originated by rubbish pollution are innumerable. Firstly, to control population grow up is the most effective solution which is not impractical and unattainable but comprehensible and feasible. Actually, the most increasing comes from the third world countries. So, this is not only the task of these nations but it needs also a global action. This means governments of different countries have to help each other. Furthermore, the new technologies need to be introduced into the production. For this purpose, governments are responsible to help companies to upgrade their technology chains. Actually, while investing in science to study on new technology is a useful action to process, governments can also buy from the developed countries to reduce time and cost.
In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, I believe that although the rubbish pollution is now a crucial issue, the causes are clearly seen and various solutions which need the collaboration of governments from different countries could be adopted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...olutions. At the outset, there are a myriad of reasons why people is producing more...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('recently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('research') instead of another adjective.
... rubbish every day in average following a recently research. Another point to be taken into conside...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, so, third, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31288343558 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06386289257 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0697110747 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209712252054 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632819539621 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567530902965 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113678904854 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044021826949 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.