It is often debated whether most money should be allocated to the infrastructure of very fast trains or it should be spent on the improvement of present public transport systems. However, I do agree with the former.
On the one hand, people could benefit more from commuting by fast train as its fare is cheaper than airplane while the time spent on communication could be almost the same. Furthermore, it could alleviate the congestion as well as air pollution in big cities. It is apparent that most people move to big cities in search of better job opportunities as a result the population in that area will skyrocket. But if they could commute to work by taking advantage of new trains they could live outside of the city as they assure that they would reach their workplace on time without any exhaustion. Besides, these new locomotives are mostly run on electricity so, there is no carbon emission.
On the other hand, another group of people are of the opinion that the governments should assign more budget on maintenance and repairing the existing public transport system. They believe, constructing a new railway for state-of-the-art trains will cost a lot which will take several years for accomplishing it. While there are more important areas like education and medicine which take more concentration. In my opinion, in this modern era of time for catching up with the fast pace of life the importance of faster trains are more substantial. One should consider that the convenience offered by this kind of transportation will encourage people to use them more instead of their private car and airplains which proved to be harmful for the environment.
In conclusion, However improvement of old public transportation system could have advantages for sure but in my view investing more in the constructing new railway road will be more suitable for the current lifestyle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02547770701 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93667184807 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563694267516 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5297351969 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254795313843 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845055879449 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082503049504 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171321397631 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063328078989 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.